This book blends deep engagement with constitutional theory and close attention to real-life political practice to explore how the choices political actors make in codifying constitutional amendments exert consequences on the operation of the constitution in relation to democracy, the rule of law, and the separation of powers.
It answers the following questions:
- Should constitutions append amendments sequentially to the end of the text?
- Should they embed amendments directly into the existing text, with notations about what has been modified and how?
- Should constitutions instead insert amendments into the text without indicating at all that any alteration has occurred?
The book examines the 3 major models of amendment codification-the appendative, the integrative, and the invisible models-and also shows how some jurisdictions have innovated alternative forms of amendment codification that combine elements of more than 1 model in a unique hybridisation driven by history, law, and politics.
Constitutional designers rarely consider this question of central significance to the operation of constitutions: where in the constitution to codify amendments once they are ratified? This innovative book is the first to explain why the placement of constitutional amendments concerns more than mere aesthetics. It involves how and whether a people remembers its past, how the constitutional text will be interpreted and by whom, and whether the constitution will be easily accessible to the governed.
A global tour of the high stakes of constitutional design in every region of the world, this book features 18 contributors across Africa, America, Asia and Oceania, and Europe raising new questions, opening our eyes to new streams of research, and uncovering new possibilities for constitutional design.
