The history of international adjudication is all too often presented as a triumphalist narrative of normative and institutional progress that casts aside its uncomfortable memories, its darker legacies and its historical failures.
In this narrative, the bulk of 'trials' and 'errors' is left in the dark, confined to oblivion or left for erudition to recall as a curiosity. Written by an interdisciplinary group of lawyers, historians and social scientists, this volume relies on the rich and largely unexplored archive of institutional and legal experimentation since the late nineteenth century to shed new light on the history of international adjudication.
It combines contextual accounts of failed, or aborted, as well as of 'successful' experiments to clarify our understanding of the past and present of international adjudication.
- Provides an accessible entry point to several experiments in international adjudication and revisits forgotten or understudied institutional experiments, the 'trials' and 'errors' rather than the success stories of international adjudication
- Examines experiments in a specific context and shows that the roots of several major developments are to be found in little-known experiments
- Contributes to the growing body of research on the history of international adjudication and, more broadly, the history of international law
