Since its establishment at the turn of the century, a central preoccupation of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has been to catalyse the pursuit of criminal accountability at the domestic level. Drawing on ten years of research, this book theorizes the ICC's principle of complementarity as a transnational site and adaptive strategy for realizing an array of ambitious governance goals. Through a grounded, inter-disciplinary approach, it illustrates how complementarity came to be framed as a “catalyst for compliance” and its unexpected effects on the legal frameworks and institutions of three different ICC “situation countries” in Africa: Uganda, Kenya, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Linking complementarity's law and practice to contemporary debates in international law and relations, the book unsettles international law's dominant progressive narrative. It urges a critical rethinking of the ICC's politics and a reorientation towards international criminal justice as a project of global legal pluralism.
- Examines how International Criminal Court (ICC) interventions have evolved over time and their effects on the pursuit of domestic criminal accountability
- Urges a critical rethinking of the ICC's politics and offers concrete recommendations for future practice
- Illustrates tensions between the legal and policy dimensions of complementarity, and how the ICC has struggled to reconcile them in practice
- Draws on constructivist theory and contemporary debates in international law and relations to theorize the evolution of complementarity
